[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Pterosaur celebration
At 06.22 16/09/2003 -0500, David Peters wrote:
No, the reason is historical, not phylogenetic.
Why celebrate the 30th year of the discovery of Eudimorphodon?
Is it because National Geographic anointed Eudimorphodon as the great
grand-daddy of them all? Unwin points to Preondactylus and Kellner likes
Batrachognathus in that role.
Eudimorphodon was collected and published before
other Triassic pterosaurs. Thus it is the first Italian pterosaur .
The first paper on Eudimorphodon ranzii is not the well known one by Wild
1978 but a previous more obscure note by Zambelli, who dedicated the
species to a renowned professor of Zoology of Milano University, Silvio
Ranzi. Being written in Italian language by a fish expert, it is feasible
that it was skipped outside Italy.
Besides that, Eudimorphodon in Bergamo is a symbol, like a state fossil for
Anyway I hope Fabio Dalla Vecchia will help to clarify about the astounding
similarity (are they cogeneric Fabio??) between Preondactyus
Will anyone be discussing archosaur versus prolacertiform origins? I
haven't heard _any_ pros or cons since 2000.
No. Not in this workshop.
Fabio and myself did plan a long time project on this, based on morphology,
but both of us have little, very little time to carry on with it, thus it
is still at an embryonic stage. Hopefully, when I will be completely
settled where I am now, I will have more free time to get into this.
"there's treasure everywhere"
(from a strip of Calvin & Hobbes)
"The bad man is the job of the good man"
Prof. Silvio Renesto
Department of Structural and Functional Biology
Università degli Studi dell'Insubria
via Dunant 3